【新闻摘要】
印度航空坠机初步调查报告出炉，结果比宝莱坞悬疑片还烧脑！报告称起飞后几秒内两具引擎的燃油切断开关被人从"运行"掰到"切断"位置，导致241名乘客和19名地面人员遇难。最诡异的是，飞行员对话录音显示两人互相甩锅："你为啥切断燃料？""不是我干的！"——这剧情简直比《空中浩劫》还离奇。现在印度飞行员协会气得跳脚，怒斥媒体"没证据就暗示飞行员自杀太缺德"，而航空专家则吐槽报告"选择性披露信息"，连驾驶舱录音都不放全。看来这场空难调查，已经成功从技术问题升级成了罗生门！
---
**While the preliminary report into what caused the loss of Air India Flight 171 last month has provided some answers, it has also prompted a wave of speculation about its cause.**
尽管上月印度航空171航班空难的初步调查报告给出部分答案，但也引发了对事故原因的大量猜测。
**The Boeing 787 Dreamliner crashed into a building less than a minute after take-off from the city of Ahmedabad in western India en route to London, killing 241 people on board, along with 19 on the ground. One passenger survived.**
这架波音787梦想客机从印度西部艾哈迈达巴德起飞不到一分钟便撞向建筑物，造成机上241人和地面19人遇难，仅一名乘客生还。
**Information contained in India's Air Accident Investigation Bureau report, the first official account of what happened, has raised questions about the role of the pilots.**
印度航空事故调查局的报告作为首份官方事故说明，其中信息引发了对飞行员操作的质疑。
**However, experts within the aviation industry claim investigators have been highly selective in what they have chosen to say.**
但航空业专家指调查人员存在严重的选择性披露。
**Under international protocols, the state leading an air accident investigation is meant to issue a preliminary report within 30 days.**
根据国际惯例，空难调查主导国应在30天内发布初步报告。
**The 15-page document published by India's Air Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) on Saturday fulfils this requirement.**
印度航空事故调查局周六发布的15页文件履行了这一要求。
**The report does not set out any conclusions as to the cause of the accident. Nevertheless, it has sparked considerable controversy.**
报告未就事故原因给出结论，但仍引发巨大争议。
**In its account of the accident flight, the AAIB states that two fuel cut-off switches were moved from the"run" to the"cut-off" position seconds after take-off.**
报告称起飞后几秒内，两个燃油切断开关被人从"运行"位拨到"切断"位。
**These switches are normally only used to turn the engines on before a flight and off afterwards.**
这些开关通常仅用于飞行前启动引擎和降落后关闭引擎。
**The report also states that one pilot asks the other"why did you cut off?", while his colleague responded that he"did not do so".**
报告还记载一名飞行员问另一人"你为何切断？"，对方回答"不是我干的"。
**The information released so far has prompted a number of commentators to claim, in the media and online, that the accident was the result of deliberate and intentional action by one of the pilots.**
目前披露的信息已引发部分评论者在媒体和网络上指控事故系飞行员故意所为。
**It is a view that has attracted an angry response from the Indian Commercial Pilots' Association, which warned that"invoking such a serious allegation based on incomplete or preliminary information is not only irresponsible – it is deeply insensitive to the individuals and families involved".**
印度商业飞行员协会愤怒回应，警告"基于不完整或初步信息提出如此严重指控不仅不负责任，更是对相关人员和家庭的极度冷漠"。
**Since the report was issued, the BBC has spoken to a range of people within the industry, including pilots, accident investigators and engineers.**
报告发布后，BBC采访了包括飞行员、事故调查员和工程师在内的多位业内人士。
**"They've told us stuff they want us to know at the moment, and withheld what they don't want us to know," explained one pilot, who asked not to be identified.**
"他们只透露想让我们知道的内容，隐瞒不想公开的信息，"一名要求匿名的飞行员解释。
**One of the main criticisms is the lack of a transcript from the cockpit voice recorder, which would enable the reported conversation between the pilots about the fuel cut-off switches to be put in context.**
主要批评之一是未公布驾驶舱语音记录器文字稿，导致飞行员关于燃油开关的对话缺乏上下文。
**Bjorn Fehrm, an aeronautical analyst at consultants Leeham Company said this was"totally unacceptable".**
咨询公司Leeham的航空分析师比约恩·费姆称这"完全不可接受"。
**"It's someone trying to hide something," he said.**
"这是有人在试图隐瞒什么，"他说。
（翻译说明：
1. 机构名"AAIB"首次出现标注全称"印度航空事故调查局"
2. 专业术语"fuel cut-off switches"译为"燃油切断开关"
3. 机型"Boeing 787 Dreamliner"保留"波音787梦想客机"标准译名
4. 直接引语完整保留对话冲突感
5. 数据"241/19"严格对应原文伤亡数字
6. 整体保持航空报道的专业性与事故调查的悬疑性）
