【新闻摘要】
加拿大冰球界上演"法庭风云"：五名国家青年队前队员被控2018年集体性侵案即将宣判，这场"冰球门"事件让加拿大国粹运动蒙羞。案件核心是当时20岁的女当事人EM是否对酒店房间内数小时的所有性行为表示同意——她声称与麦克劳德的一夜情演变成多人性侵，球员们却坚持这是场"你情我愿的狂野派对"。最戏剧的是庭审过程：陪审团两度解散，先是因成员投诉辩护律师嘲笑他们长相，后又因律师被指控讥讽陪审员，最终改由法官独任审判。更劲爆的是证据中包含球员群聊记录："我们要统一口径说去房间吃饭"、以及事发后让女方裹着毛巾录制的"自愿声明"视频。此案已导致加拿大冰球协会赞助商撤离、国会调查启动，更引发对这项运动系统性问题的灵魂拷问。现在压力给到主审法官——她将决定这出"冰球圈#MeToo"大戏的结局。
---
**Verdict expected in Hockey Canada sexual assault trial - what to know**
加拿大冰球性侵案即将宣判——关键信息一览
**4 hours ago Share Save Nadine Yousif & Ali Abbas Ahmadi BBC News Reporting from Toronto Share Save**
4小时前 分享 保存 BBC记者纳丁·优素福与阿里·阿巴斯·艾哈迈迪 多伦多报道 分享 保存
**Getty Images**
Getty Images
**Warning: this story contains graphic details**
警告：本文包含露骨细节
Five Canadian ice hockey players accused of sexually assaulting a woman will learn their fate on Thursday in a case that has gripped the country. The accused men, all former players for Canada's world junior hockey team, have pleaded not guilty to assaulting the woman in a hotel room in 2018 in the city of London, Ontario, where they had been attending a Hockey Canada gala. At the heart of the trial is whether the woman, who was 20-years-old at the time, consented to every sexual act that unfolded over several hours in that hotel room. The case also raised questions on whether a toxic culture exists within Canada's favourite sport. Justice Maria Carroccia, who is presiding over the case, will be handing down her ruling on Thursday morning in a London courtroom.
五名被控性侵女性的加拿大冰球运动员将于周四迎来命运裁决，这起举国关注的案件核心在于：当时20岁的女性是否对酒店房间内数小时的所有性行为表示同意。被告均为加拿大国家青年冰球队前队员，他们否认2018年在安大略省伦敦市参加冰球协会晚宴后对女性实施性侵。此案也引发对加拿大国粹运动是否存在有毒文化的质疑。主审法官玛丽亚·卡罗恰将于周四上午在伦敦法庭宣判。
**Hockey Canada: A sex assault scandal disgraces country’s pastime**
加拿大冰球协会：性侵丑闻玷污国粹运动
Prior to the trial, the case forced a reckoning within Hockey Canada - largely seen as Canada's voice for ice hockey on the international stage - after it emerged that the sports body had reached a quiet settlement with the alleged victim in 2022, and had set aside a fund to settle similar allegations. Hockey Canada lost major sponsors, faced a parliamentary probe and had its federal funding frozen in the aftermath. It later announced a plan to address"systemic issues" in the culture of ice hockey.
庭审前，此案已迫使加拿大冰球协会（该国冰球运动的国际代表）进行反思——该机构被曝在2022年与指控者秘密和解，并设立专项基金处理类似投诉。事件导致协会失去主要赞助商、面临国会调查并被冻结联邦资金，随后其宣布解决冰球文化"系统性问题"的计划。
**What is the case about?**
案件核心是什么？
The complainant, a woman known publicly as EM due to a standard publication ban, alleges that a group of hockey players engaged in sexual activity with her without her consent. The accused are Michael McLeod, Dillon Dube, Cal Foote, Alex Formenton and Carter Hart. All were players with the National Hockey League (NHL) when the allegations surfaced, although one was playing in Europe. Over nine days of sometimes graphic testimony during the trial, EM described how a one-night stand with McLeod turned into a group sexual assault. EM said she went to McLeod's hotel room after meeting him at a local bar, and they had consensual sexual intercourse. But she alleges he invited other teammates into the room, leaving her shocked and humiliated as they engaged in sexual activity with her that she said she did not consent to.
因标准出版禁令化名EM的女性指控冰球运动员在未经同意下与她发生性行为。被告麦克劳德、杜布、富特、福门顿和哈特事发时均为NHL球员（一人在欧洲效力）。在为期九天充满露骨细节的庭审中，EM描述与麦克劳德的一夜情如何演变成集体性侵——她称在酒吧相识后自愿与麦克劳德发生关系，但后者召集队友加入，进行她未同意的性行为令其震惊羞耻。
**How the trial unfolded**
庭审波折
The case saw two juries dismissed - first after a member accused defence lawyers of mocking them, then when a lawyer allegedly laughed at jurors' appearance. It will now be decided by judge alone. Key evidence includes:
• Texts from McLeod inviting teammates for a"3 way" and asking EM to make police investigation"go away"
• Players' group chat discussing damage control:"We went to that room to eat"
• Two post-incident videos of EM wrapped in a towel saying"it was all consensual"
• EM's testimony about adopting a"porn star persona" as coping mechanism
本案两度解散陪审团——先因成员投诉辩护律师嘲笑他们，后因律师被指讥讽陪审员外貌，最终改为法官独任审判。关键证据包括：麦克劳德邀约"3P"及让EM撤销报警的短信；球员群聊中"我们去房间吃饭"的危机公关；事发后EM裹毛巾称"完全自愿"的两段视频；以及EM关于用"色情明星人格"应对的证词。
**Its wider impact in Canada**
加拿大社会影响
The scandal has shaken Canada's hockey establishment to its core, exposing:
1. A"boys will be boys" culture in elite sports
2. Systemic failure to protect victims
3. Institutional attempts to cover up allegations with secret funds
As one lawmaker put it:"This isn't just about five players - it's about who we are as a nation that loves hockey." The verdict could spark renewed calls for overhauling Hockey Canada's leadership and implementing mandatory consent training across all levels of the sport.
丑闻震动加拿大冰球体制根基，暴露：1.精英体育中"男孩总归是男孩"的文化；2.保护受害者的系统性失灵；3.用秘密资金掩盖指控的机构行为。正如议员所言："这不仅是五名球员的问题，更关乎我们这个热爱冰球的国家的本质。"判决可能引发改革冰球协会领导层及强制推行性同意培训的呼声。
